Introduction<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
After the Book of Agency, Imam al-Nawawi (631\u2013676 AH \/ 1233\u20131277 CE) presents the Book of Acknowledgment (Kitab al-Iqrar<\/em>). The word iqrar<\/em> means affirmation or confirmation, and in the legal sense it refers to a person’s statement that a right is owed by himself to another. It differs from a claim (da’wa<\/em>), in which a person asserts a right for himself, and from testimony (shahadah<\/em>), in which a person reports a right owed by someone else.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Acknowledgment is among the strongest forms of proof in the law, since a person is the one who knows best what he owes, and it is unlikely that he would speak against his own interest without a reason. The Qur’an calls on believers to stand firm for justice even if it is against themselves, and the tradition records that the Prophet gave effect to such statements. This article follows the main themes of the book in the general order of the Minhaj<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The book identifies four elements:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Each has its own conditions, which determine whether the statement has legal effect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The person must be mature, sane, and acting by his own choice. The acknowledgment of a child, an insane person, or someone who is forced is not binding. Al-Nawawi then addresses several special cases:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The person in whose favor the statement is made must be capable of holding the right, and must be identified, at least in a general way. If the beneficiary rejects the acknowledgment, the school considers whether the matter remains with the person who admitted it or is considered abandoned, and states the consequences. The book also covers acknowledgments in favor of someone who is unborn or unknown, under conditions that allow the acknowledgment to be understood.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The matter admitted must be something that can be a right owed by one person to another. It may be a debt, a specific item, a benefit, or a right such as a share of an inheritance. Acknowledgment may also concern matters that have no financial value, such as a claim of retaliation. If the matter admitted is impossible or contrary to what is known, the statement has no effect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A large part of the book concerns the wording of acknowledgments and how it is interpreted. The principle is that the words are understood according to their ordinary meaning and the custom of the speaker. Several distinctions are important:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The book also notes that an acknowledgment stated in writing or by a clear gesture, in the case of a person who cannot speak, may be effective.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A speaker may qualify his statement with an exception, as in “He has a thousand against me, except two hundred.” The school accepts such an exception if it is connected to the statement without a pause and does not cancel the whole of it. If the exception removes the entire amount or is separated from it, the exception is disregarded and the statement stands. This protects the other person’s right while allowing the speaker to express the amount accurately.<\/p>\n\n\n\n When a person admits that he owes something but does not state the amount, the book states that he is asked to clarify, and that he is bound by whatever amount he specifies, provided it can be a right with value. If he refuses to clarify, the judge may compel him, and the school sets out how to proceed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A central question is whether a person can take back what he has admitted. The school distinguishes between two kinds of rights:<\/p>\n\n\n\n This distinction shows how the school protects individuals’ claims while remaining lenient toward matters of divine right.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The book extends the principle to acknowledgments of family relationship, such as admitting that a certain person is one’s child or sibling. The school sets conditions, including that the claim is not impossible, such as when the age difference is implausible, and that it does not contradict a known lineage. It also covers an heir’s acknowledgment of a debt owed by the deceased, and explains how that affects the rest of the heirs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The book begins by defining acknowledgment and its elements, then proceeds to the people involved, the wording, the exceptions, and finally the consequences, including retraction and special cases. This order moves from the general to the specific, and from the formation of the statement to its effects. It also helps the student see why acknowledgment is a distinct subject: it is less about a contract between two parties than about the legal weight of one person’s own words.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For al-Nawawi, acknowledgment expresses a moral principle as well as a legal one. A believer is expected to tell the truth about what he owes, even when it costs him, and the law responds by giving such statements strong effect. At the same time, the rules protect against abuse: they require capacity and free choice, they interpret ambiguous words carefully, and they allow retraction where a penalty is at stake. The result is a law that honors honesty without turning it into a trap.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Note: This article summarizes the general Shafi’i position as presented in Minhaj al-Talibin. Details, including the interpretation of particular expressions and the treatment of special cases, can vary between editions and commentaries and differ among the schools. Readers who need a precise ruling should consult a qualified teacher or scholar.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Part 2: Transactions (Mu\u2019amalat) – Acknowledgment (Iqrar) Part of a series on the structure of Minhaj al-Talibin, the classical Shafi’i<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":192,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"colormag_page_container_layout":"default_layout","colormag_page_sidebar_layout":"default_layout","video_url":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[55,12,15,57,14,27],"class_list":["post-191","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-part-2-transactions-muamalat","tag-acknowledgment","tag-fiqh","tag-imam-al-nawawi","tag-iqrar-2","tag-minhaj-al-thalibin","tag-transactions-muamalat"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lslam.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lslam.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lslam.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lslam.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lslam.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=191"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lslam.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":194,"href":"https:\/\/lslam.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191\/revisions\/194"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lslam.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/192"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lslam.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=191"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lslam.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=191"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lslam.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=191"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}1. The pillars of acknowledgment<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
2. The one who makes the acknowledgment<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
3. The one in whose favor it is made<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
4. The subject matter<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
5. The wording and its interpretation<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
![\"The](\"https:\/\/lslam.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/Panduan-Redaksi-Pengakuan-dan-Tafsirnya-961x1024.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n\n
6. Exceptions within the statement<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
7. Unspecified amounts<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
8. Retraction<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
9. Acknowledgment of lineage and of the deceased’s debts<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Why the order matters<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Closing reflection<\/h2>\n\n\n\n